Simulation of the Implementation of the Single Transferable Vote in Bosnia and Herzegovina – the Case of Elections for the Parliamentary Assembly in 2000

Stefan Vukojević

Abstract


The electoral system is deeply divided and post-conflict societies have a prominent place in the existing literature studying political and institutional regulation. One of the assumptions is that the electoral system encourages political actors to act and behave more moderately or radically. Proportional representation electoral systems are widespread and are generally considered the most suitable for the representation of social groups, although the success of their outcomes remains disputable. Two types of proportional systems – party lists and single transferable vote – stand mutually opposed from the standpoints of incentives of political actors to political moderation. The party lists system (list-PR) was criticized for encouraging more radical behavior as opposed to the single transferable vote (STV) which instigated more moderate behavior. The outcomes of the named two types of proportional systems will be compared based on the case study of the elections for the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina which were held in 2000, using counterfactual simulation. Contrary to the expected outcomes of the STV, the electoral simulation will show that the list-PR has proven to be a more successful institutional solution in terms of encouraging political moderation. A STV would not significantly lead to an interethnic exchange of preferences, nor the representation of the small moderate parties, contrary to the list-PR that enabled their representation.

Keywords


Electoral system; proportional representation; elections; Bosnia and Herzegovina

Full Text:

PDF

References


AEC (Australian Electoral Commission) (2016), Above the line and below the line voting: Senate Ballot Paper Study 2016, https://www.aec.gov.au/about_ aec/research/files/sbps-atl-and-btl-voting.pdf

Arapović, Adis (2012), Izborni sistem Bosne i Hercegovine: kritička analiza i kompilacija izbornog zakonodavstva, Centri civilnih inicijativa, Tuzla

Arnautović, Suad (2009), Političko predstavlјanje i izborni sistemi u Bosni i Hercegovini u XX stolјeću, Promocult, Sarajevo

Arnautović, Suad (2021), ˝Izborni proces u Bosni i Hercegovini: Hibridni spoj modernih i zastarjelih rješenja˝, u: Cvitković, Ivan (ur.), Reforma izbornog zakonodavstva Bosne i Hercegovine, Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, 48-79.

Belloni, Roberto (2007), State Building and International Intervention in Bosnia. Routledge, London and New York

Bieber, Florian (2006), Post-War Bosnia: Ethnicity, Inequality and Public Sector Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

Bochsler, Daniel (2012), ˝Non-discriminatory Rules and Ethnic Representation: The Election of the Bosnian State Presidency˝, Ethnopolitics, 11(1), 66-84.

Bowler, Shaun, David M. Farrell (1991a), ˝Party Loyalties in Complex Settings: STV and Party Identification˝, Political Studies, 39(2), 350-362.

Bowler, Shaun, David M. Farrell (1991b), ˝Voter Behavior under STV-PR: Solving the Puzzle of the Irish Party System˝, Political Behavior, 13(4), 303-320.

Bowler, Shaun, Bernard Grofman (eds.) (2000), Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution, University of Michigan Press, Michigan

Centralna izborna komisija Bosne i Hercegovine https://www.izbori.ba/ defa- ult.aspx?Lang=3

Electoral Council of Australia, Proportional representation voting systems of Australia’s parliaments. https://www.ecanz.gov.au/sites/default/files/2-proportional-representation-voting-systems.pdf?acsf_files_redirect

Farrell, David M. (2001), Electoral systems: A comparative Introduction, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

Fearon, James D. (1991), ˝Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science˝, World Politics, 43(2), 169-195.

Hartzell, Caroline, Matthew Hoddie (2003), ˝Institutionalizing Peace: Power-Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management˝, American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 318-332.

Horowitz, Donald L. (1991), A Democratic South Africa? – Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles

Horowitz, Donakd L. (2002), ˝Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes˝, In: Reynolds, A. (ed.), Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 15-36.

ICG (International Crisis Group) (1998), Changing the logic of Bosnian Politics: ICG Discussion Paper in Electoral Reform. Sarajevo, http://repository.forcedmigration.org/show_metadata.jsp?pid=fmo:1827

ICG (2002), BH Alijansa za (omanje) promjene, Sarajevo/Brisel, https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/132-bosnia-s-alliance-for-smallish-change-bosnian.pdf

Jarstad, Anna K., Desiree Nilsson (2008), ˝From Words to Deeds: The Implementation of Power-Sharing Pacts in Peace Accords˝, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(3), 206-223.

Lebow, Richard Ned (2000), ˝What’s So Different about a Counterfactual?˝, World Politics, 52(4), 550-585.

Levy, Jack S. (2008), ˝Counterfactuals and Case Studies˝, in: Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Henry E. Brady, David Collier (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 627-644.

Lijphart, Arend (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, Yale University Press, New Haven and London

Lijphart, Arend (1986), ˝Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas˝, in: Grofman, Bernard, Arend Lijphart (eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, Agathon Press, New York, 170-179.

Lijphart, Arend (1991), ˝The alternative vote: a realistic alternative for South Africa?˝, Politikon, 18(2), 91-101.

Lijphart, Arend (2002), ˝The Wave of Power-Sharing Democracy˝, in: Reynolds, Andrew (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 37-54. Oxford

Lijphart, Arend (2004), ˝Constitutional Design for Divided Societies˝, Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96-109.

Manning, Carrie, Miljenko Antić (2003), ˝The Limits of Electoral Engineering˝, Journal of Democracy, 14(3), 45-59.

Mitchell, Paul (2014), ˝The single transferable vote and ethnic conflict: The evidence from Northern Ireland˝, Electoral Studies, 33(1), 246-257.

Mozaffar, Shaheen (2010), ˝Electoral Rules and Post-Civil War Conflict Management: The Limitations of Institutional Design˝, in: Hoddie, Matthew, Caroline A. Hartzell (eds.), Strengthening Peace in Post-Civil War States: Transforming Spoilers into Stakeholders, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 79-104.

Mujkić, Asim (2008), ˝Ideološki problemi konsocijacijske demokratije u Bo- sni i Hercegovini˝, Status: Magazin za političku kulturu i društvena pitanja, 13, 122-132.

Norris, Pippa (2008), Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) (2001), Report on the elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina (11 November 2000), Strasbourg. 12 January, https://rm.coe.int/168071a39a

Passarelli, Gianluca (2020), Preferential Voting Systems: Influence on Intra- Party Competition and Voting Behaviour, Palgrave, London

Pejanović, Mirko (2013), Ogledi o državnosti i političkom razvoju BiH (treće dopunjeno izdanje), TKD Šahinpašić, Sarajevo

Rajli, Ben (1997), ˝Višenacionalni izbori u Bosni i Hercegovini – opcije za reforme˝, u: Reynolds, Andrew, Ben Reilly (ur.), International IDEA - Priručnik za oblikovanje izbornog sistema, Međunarodni institut za demokratiju i izbornu asistenciju, Štokholm, 138-148.

Reilly, Ben (2001), Democracy in Divided Societies – Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Reilly, Ben (2006), ˝Political Engineering and Party Politics in Conflict-Prone Societies˝, Democratization, 13(5), 811-827.

Reynolds, Andrew (ed.) (2002), Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Reynolds, Andrew (2005), ˝Constitutional Medicine˝, Journal of Democracy, 16(1), 54-68.

Sahadžić, Maja (2011), ˝Izbori i izborni sistem Bosne i Hercegovine˝, u: Banović, Damir, Saša Gavrić (ur.), Država, politika i društvo u Bosni i Hercegovini: analiza postdejtonskog političkog sistema, University Press – Magistrat izdanja, Sarajevo, 397-415

Taagepera, Rein, Matthew Soberg Shugart (1989), Seat and Votes: the Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems, Yale University Press, New Haven

Tetlock, Philip E., Aaron Belkin (1996), ˝Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives˝, in: Tetlock, Philip E., Aaron Belkin (eds.), Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, Princeton University Press Princeton, 1-38.

Vukojevic, Stefan (2017), ˝Institutional design of post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina: “extreme case” in comparative politics, Политичка ревија, 172, 157-173.

Vukojević, Stefan B. (2019), Posljedice izbornog sistema na stabilnost političkih institucija u postdejtonskoj Bosni i Hercegovini (1996-2014), doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka

Vukojević, Stefan (2020), ˝Political stability in deeply divided and post-conflict societies˝, Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, 174, 207-222.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2022.7.1.313

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2490-3604 (print) ● ISSN: 2490-3647 (online)

Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.