Differences in Functioning of Families Of Children with Intellectual Disabilities In Relation to the Number of Children in the Family
Abstract
To determine the quality of family relationships the terms functionality and dysfunction are used and refer to patterns of organizing the family process. The study aims to determine whether the number of children in families of children with intellectual disabilities affects its functioning. The sample consisted of parents of children with intellectual disabilities of primary school age (N=40), of whom 28 were parents (70.0%) with one and two children and 12 parents (30.0%) with three or more children. Family functioning was examined by the Beavers model, and the Self-report Family Inventory scale Version II was applied. The scale assesses five family dimensions: health/competencies, conflict, cohesion, leadership, and expressiveness, while lower scores indicate higher competencies across all dimensions. After giving written consent to participate in the study, the parents completed the scale individually. Only one parent provided family information. The results of the study show that out of 28 families with one or two children, 11 (39.28%) are functional and 17 (60.71%) are dysfunctional families, while in families where there are three or more children, 12 of them, has 4 (33.3%) functional and 8 (66.6%) dysfunctional families. Although families that are slightly more dysfunctional are present in families with one and two children, the differences are not statistically significant, and there is no statistically significant difference in the functioning of families of children with intellectual disabilities about the number of children. The results of the research by dimensions showed that families of children with intellectual disabilities do not differ statistically significantly on any of the five family dimensions. Both groups of families, families with one and two children and families with three and more children achieve on all family dimensions scores below the mean of the dimensions, meaning that both groups of families exhibit good competencies across all dimensions.
Due to the limitations of the research relating to the small total sample, small sub-samples, and the fact that
mothers mainly evaluated the functioning of families, there is a need to repeat the research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Axelsson, Ana Karin, Mats Granlund, Jenny Wilder (2013), „Engagement in family activities: a quantitative, comparative study of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and children with typical development“, Child: care, health and development 39(4), 523-534.
Beavers, Robert, Robert B. Hampson (2000), „The Beavers system model of family functioning“, Journal of Family Therapy 22, 128-143. Preuzeto 4. 2. 2020 sa https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-6427.00143
Cicović Maslovar, Julijana B. (2015), Uloga porodičnog funkcionisanja i samopoimanja u predikciji antisocijalnog ponašanja u adolescenciji, Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
Dyson, Lily L. (1993), „Response to the presence of a child with disabilities: parental stress and family functioning over time“, American Journal on Mental Retardation 98(2), 207-218.
Fenning, Rachel M., Jason K. Baker, Bruce L. Baker, Keith Crnic (2007), „Parenting children with borderline intellectual functioning: a unique risk population“, American Journal on Mental Retardation 112(2), 107-121.
Fenning, Rachel M., Jason K. Baker, Bruce L. Baker, Keith Crnic (2014), „Parent-child interaction over time in families of young children with borderline intellectual functioning“, Journal of Family Psychology 28(3), 326-335.
Honda, Junko, Naohiro Hohashi (2015), „Discrepancies between couples’ perceptions of family functioning in child-rearing Japanese families“, Nursing and Health Sciences 17(1), 57-63.
Mujkanović, Elvira, Sadeta Zečić, Elvir Mujkanović (2014), „Kvaliteta života članova porodice djeteta s posebnim potrebama“, u: Milena Nikolić (ur.), Unapređenje kvalitete života djece i mladih, tematski zbornik sa V Međunarodne naučno-stručne konferencije, Udruženje za podršku i kreativni razvoj djece i mladih i Edukacijsko-rehabilitacijski fakultet, Tuzla, 375-385.
Rani, Pastin Pushpa, Helen Charles, Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell, K. G. Selvaraj, Priya Mary Mammen, Sushila Russel, Mutathu K. C. Nair (2018), „Dysfunction among Families of Children with Intellectual Disability in India Using Systems Model: Prevalence, Pattern, and Severity of Impairment“, Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 40(1), 33-37.
Rieger, Alicja, Patric J. McGrail (2013), „Coping humor and family functioning in parents of children with disabilities“, Rehabilitation psychology 58(1), 89-97.
Škrbina, Dijana (2010), „Podrška udomitelja koji udomljavaju djecu s Down sindromom“, Život i škola 23(1), 9-34.
Svetozarević, Snežana, Jasmina Barišić, Dragana Duišin (2016), „Disfunkcionalnost porodice“, Engrami 38 (2), 71-83.
Wagner Jakab, Ana (2008), „Obitelj – Sustav dinamičnih odnosa u interakciji“, Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja 44(2), 119-128.
Wagner Jakab, Ana, Daniela Cvitković, Renata Hojanić (2006), „Neke značajke odnosa sestara / braće i osoba s posebnim potrebama“, Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja 42(1), 77-86.
Zloković, Jasminka, Andrea Lukajić (2016), „Osnaživanje obitelji kroz poticanje pozitivnih porodičnih odnosa i kohezije“, u: Jovana Milutinović (ur.), Zbornik Odseka za pedagogiju 25, Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu, 7-22.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 2490-3604 (print) ● ISSN: 2490-3647 (online)
Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.