Academic Staff – Between A Stable Decision To Stay And An Insecure Projection Of Departure From The Faculty

Mirna Markovic


Academic staff is the most important resource of the university, and as such determines its success in meeting the traditionally defined mission: building and disseminating knowledge aimed at breeding, training and upbringing the most important resource of the society - people. For this reason, any unplanned voluntary departure from a university can be understood as a waste of intellectual capital that is not easy to compensate. Although each departure cannot necessarily be characterized as dysfunctional (certain departures are desirable, such as temporary departures in the function of mobility in the academic community, but also the departure of incompetent employees or those who do not want or cannot adapt to the organizational culture and climate of the university), can often be recognized as a symptom of the employee’s dissatisfaction that the organization often fails, intentionally or not, to identify. In addition to the obvious consequences of dysfunctional departures, from those directly perceptible and measurable (e.g. problems in organizing teaching and mentoring student work, costs associated with the process of finding adequate substitution, etc.) to less noticeable (e.g. reducing satisfaction with the workload of the remaining academic staff, greater exposure to stress caused by work, more negative organizational climate, etc.), research suggests that even thinking about possible leaving the current job can have significant effects on organizational effectiveness. An employee who is preoccupied with thinking about leaving the organization is more inclined to psychologically distance himself from the immediate social environment (working colleagues and associates), is less motivated, and less willing to effectively contribute to the operations of the organization he is working in. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the possible contribution of perceived changes in the working conditions caused by the metamorphosis of the traditional model of the university into a corporate model, to academic staff thinking about leaving the job, and even academic careers. In this context, special attention will be paid to defining the role of the university management in maintaining (restoring) the climate of confidence as a prerequisite for the academic staff’s positive reception of any changes in the working conditions, a positive evaluation of work, and an optimistic consideration of the certainty of residency in the current job. The emphasis is on the academic staff’s trust in the perseverance of the academic community to protect the traditional values of the academy, its autonomy and dignity in the society. By maintaining a climate of trust, investing in the development and accumulation of the psychological capital of a university, and by building a positive psychological contract between the academic staff and the management, it is possible to create conditions for introducing change that will be perceived as meaningful and necessary, even when initially negatively connotated.


academic staff; intention to leave; the role of the management; a climate of trust; the psychological capital of a university; psychological contract

Full Text:



Ajzen, Icek (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211,

Appollis, Verna Patricia (2010), “The relationship between intention to Quit, Psychological capital and Job satisfaction in the Tourism industry in the Western Cape“, Magistarski rad. Western Cape, EMS Faculty.

Bartell, Marvin (2003), “Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework”, Higher Education, 45(1), 43-70,

Bellamy, Sheila, Clive Morley, Kim Watty (2003), “Why business academics remain in Australian universities despite deteriorating working conditions and reduced job satisfaction: an intellectual puzzle“, Journal of Higher Educational Policy and Management, 25 (1), 13-28,

Decramer, Adelien, Johan Christiaens, Alex Vanderstraeten (2007), “Individual Performance Management in Higher Education Institutions“, Rad prezentiran na “29th Annual Eair Forum”, Innsbruck, Austria (26-29 August, 2007).

Firth, Lucy, David Mellor, Kathleen Moore, Claude Loquet (2004), “How can managers reduce employee intention to quit?”, Journal Managerial Psychology, 19, 170-87,

Hope-Hailey, Veronica, Ros Searle, Graham Dietz (2012), “Where has all the trust gone?”, London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development research report (dostupno na:

Jerneić, Željko, Vera Kutleša (2012), “Stavovi prema radu, radni učinak i namjera napuštanja organizacije kod znanstvenih djelatnika“, Suvremena psihologija, 15(1), 43-46.

Yukl, Gary (2008), Rukovođenje u organizacijama, 1. Izdanje, Naklada Slap, Jastrebarsko.

Karakuş, Mehmet, Mustafa Toprak, Murat Gürpınar (2014), “Structural equation modelling on the relationships between teacher’s trust in manager, commitment to manager, satisfaction with manager and intent to leave”, Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 165-189,

Lazear, Edward P. (2001), "Educational Production," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, 116(3), 777-803,

Liessmann, Konrad Paul (2008), Teorija neobrazovanosti: Zablude društva znanja, Naklada Jesenski i Turk, Zagreb.

Guzina, M. (1980), Kadrovska psihologija, Naučna knjiga, Beograd.

March, James.G, Herbert. A. Simon (1958), Organizations. Wiley, New York.

McCarthy, G., Mark Tyrrell, Elaine Lehane (2007), “Intention to Leave or Stay in Nursing“, Journal of Nursing Management, 15, 248-255,

Meyer, John, Natalie Allen (1991), “A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment“, Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-98,

Meyer, John, Natalie Allen, Catherine Smith (1993), Commitment toorganizations and occupations: extension and test of a three component conceptualization“ Journal of Applied Psychology,78 (4), 538-551,

Mintzberg, Henry, Ludo Van der Heyden (1999), “Organigraphs: Drawing how companies really work”, Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 87-94.

Paillé, Pascal, Laurent Bourdeau, Isabelle Galois (2010), “Support, Trust, satisfaction, intent to leave and citizenship at organizational level. A social exchange approach“, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(1), 41-58,

Robbins, Stephen P., Timothy A. Judge (2009), Organizacijsko ponašanje. MATE, Zagreb.

Smart, John C. (1990) “A causal model of faculty turnover intentions“, Research in higher education, 31(5), 405-424,

Sverke, Magnus, Johnny Hellgren, Katharina Naswall (2002), “No security: A Meta-analysis and Review of Job Insecurity and its Consequences“, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242-264.

Tett, Robert P., John P. Meyer (1993), “Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings”, Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293,

Van Dick, Rolf, Oliver Christ, Jost Stellmacher, Ulrich Wagner, Oliver Ahlswede, Cornelia Grubba, Martin Hauptmeier, Corinna Höhfeld, Kai Moltzen, Patrick A. Tissington (2004), “Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction”, British Journal of Management, 15, 351–360,

Van Schalkwyk, Sonet, Danie H. Du Toit, Adrian S. Bothma, Sebastiaan Rothmann (2010), “Job insecurity, leadership empowerment behaviour, employee engagement and intention to leave in a petrochemical laboratory”, South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 1–7.

Vrhovski, Ivana, Davorka Živković (2010), “Komparativna analiza organizacijske kulture u procesu preuzimanja na primjeru privatnih visokih učilišta”, Praktični menadžment: stručni časopis za teoriju i praksu menadžmenta, 1(1), 16-21,

Zhou, Ying, James Fredericks Volkwein, (2004), “Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF:99”, Research in Higher Education, 45 (2), 139–176,


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.