Radbruch’s Formula in the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina – Untapped Potential for Strengthening the Rule of Law

Benjamin Nurkić

Abstract


The philosophy of Gustav Radbruch made an immeasurable contribution to the development of the concept of the rule of law. The part of Radbruch’s philosophy that still has a great influence on thought about the relationship between justice and mere legality is certainly his Formula, which can be reduced to the venerable stance of lex injusta non est lex.[1] Simply put, according to Radbruch’s Formula, any law that is ‘unjust to an intolerable degree is not legally valid and should not be applied by courts. In this text, the author finds a similarity between Radbruch’s Formula and provision VI/3(c) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) and analyzes the content of the aforementioned provision, which regulates the possibility of initiating a concrete review of the constitutionality of laws by ordinary courts. The text analyzes what the aforementioned provision of the B&H Constitution stipulates and what opportunities it offers to ordinary courts when applying the law. It also analyzes the extent to which the potential of the B&H Constitution has been used by ordinary courts in the legal system of B&H.

Keywords


Radbruch’s Formula; the B&H Constitution; concrete constitutional(judicial) review; the rule of law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ademović, Nedim, Joseph Marko, Goran Marković (2012), Ustavno pravo Bosne i Hercegovine, Fondacija Konrad Adenauer, Sarajevo

Akvinski, Toma (1990), Država (translated by Tomo Vereš), Globus, Zagreb

Albrecht Draško, Robert Podolnjak (2009), “Razlike između američkog i europskog modela nadzora ustavnosti i zakonitosti”, Pravnik, 43(87), 25-41.

Begić, Zlatan (2015), “Position of Ordinary Courts in direct implementation of constitutional norms: new perspective in the case of legislative silence in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, In Rainer Arnold & Herbert Roth (eds.), Constitutional Courts and Ordinary Courts: Cooperation or Conflict?, University press, Regensburg, 59-88.

Begić, Zlatan (2021), O ustavu, legalitetu i legitimitetu: Bosna i Hercegovina – od ZAVNOBiH-a do Dejtona i poslije, Fakultet za upravu Univerziteta u Sarajevu, Sarajevo

Bix, Brian H. (2011), “Radbruch’s Formula and conceptual analysis”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 56, 45-57.

Bix, Brian H. (2013), “Radbruch’s Formula, Conceptual Analysis, and the Rule of Law”, In Imer B. Flores & Kenneth E. Himma (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law, Springer, Dordrecht, 65-75.

Borowski, Martin (2021), “Gustav Radbruch’s Critique of Legal Positivism”, In Torben Spaak & Patricia Mindus (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism, Cambridge University Press, 627-650.

Buergenthal, Thomas (1998), Međunarodna ljudska prava u sažetom obliku, Magistrat, Sarajevo

Čavoški, Kosta, Radmila Vasić (2006), Uvod u pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu - Službeni glasnik, Beograd

Degan, Vladimir Đ. (2011), Međunarodno pravo, Školska knjiga, Zagreb

Dyzenhaus, David (2021), “Thomas Hobbes and the Rule by Law Tradition”, In: Jens Meierhenrich, Martin Loughlin (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 261–277.

Haldemann, Frank (2005), “Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law”, Ratio Juris, 18(2), 162-178.

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus (1957), “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals”, Harvard Law Review, 71, 593-629.

Hasanbegović, Jasminka (2021), Ka filozofiji prava kao filozofiji ljudskih prava, Dosije studio, Beograd

Hayek, Friedrich (1998), Poredak slobode, Global Book, Novi Sad

Karčić, Fikret (2020), “A Study on Legal Formalism in the Former Yugoslavia and its Successor States”, CIDS report, Centre for Integrity in the Defence Sector, 1(2020), 1-22.

Künzler, Adrian (2012), “Judicial Legitimacy and the Role of Courts: Explaining the Transitional Context of the German Border Guard Cases”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32(2), 349-381.

Leawoods, Heather (2000), “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher”, Journal of Law and Policy, 489-515.

Lowe, A. Vaughn (1983), “Do General Rules of International Law Exist?”, Review of International Studies, 9, 207-213.

Moustafa, Tamir, Tom Ginsburg (2008), “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics”, In Tom Ginsburg & Tamir Moustafa, (eds.), Rule bylaw: the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1-22.

Nojman, Franc (2002), Vladavina prava: politička teorija i pravni sistem u modernom društvu, Filip Višnjić, Beograd

Nurkić, Benjamin (2021), “Legal positivism: an obstacle in the process of strengthening the rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 7(1), 94-105.

Paulson, L. Stanley (2006), “On the Background and Significance of Gustav Radbruch’s Post-War Papers”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 17-40.

Radbruch, Gustav (1950/1932), “Legal philosophy”, In Edwin W. Patterson, (translated by Kurt Wilk), (eds.), The legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Massachusett

Radbruch, Gustav (2006/1946), “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)”, (translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paul- son), Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11

Radbruch, Gustav (2019), Filozofija prava (1932), 13-244; Nacrt pogovora uz Filozofiju prava (1947), 245-264; Pet minuta filozofije prava (1945), 265-266; Zakonsko nepravo i iznadzakonsko pravo (1946), 267-278, Naklada Breza, Zagreb

Sadurski, Wojciech (2014), Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe, 2nd ed., Springer, Dordrecht.

Schabas, A. William (2021), The Customary International Law of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Tan, Seow Hon (2021), “Radbruch’s Formula Revisited: The Lex Injusta Non Est Lex Maxim in Constitutional Democracies”, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 34(2), 461-491.

Trnka, Kasim (2006), Ustavno pravo, 2. izd., Fakultet za javnu upravu, Sarajevo

Tunkin, Grigory (1993), “Is General International Law Customary Law Only?”, European Journal of International Law, 4, 534-541.

Uzelac, Alan (2010), “Survival of the Third Legal Tradition?”, Supreme Court Law Review, 49, 377-396.

Waldron, Jeremy (2021), “The rule of law and the role of courts”, Global Constitutionalism, 10(1), 91–105.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2022.7.3.169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2490-3604 (print) ● ISSN: 2490-3647 (online)

Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.