Interdisciplinarity as a Rhetorical and Epistemological Practice: Erasing Boundaries Between Humanities and Social Sciences or the Need for Unity of Knowledge?

Nehrudin Rebihić, Mirza Mahmutović

Abstract


The paper discusses the concept of interdisciplinarity from the perspective of humanities and social sciences. As both an idea and practice, interdisciplinarity is understood within the context of the complex dynamics of creating and reshaping institutional arrangements that regulate the processes of knowledge production, distribution, and instrumentalization in Western society, with universities, research centers, and departments at its core, organized according to separate academic disciplines. The paper questions the understanding of disciplines as closed, homogeneous, and static structures of knowledge organization. Instead, it reflects on the complex, multiple, and topological relationships of mutual interpenetration and constitution of disciplines, emphasizing their inherent hybridity, especially within the context of the synoptic identity of humanities disciplines. Furthermore, the paper highlights the moral assumptions underlying interdisciplinary research initiatives. The productivity of the conceptual framework concerning the centralistic, pluralistic, and integralistic models of interdisciplinarity is highlighted in analyzing the possibilities and outcomes of interdisciplinary approaches in social and humanities studies.


Keywords


interdisciplinarity; disciplines; knowledge; humanities and social sciences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnold, Markus (2020) ˝Interdisciplinary Research (Interdisciplinarity)˝, u: Carayannis, E. G. (ur.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, Cham

Barthes, Roland (1999), ˝Od djela do teksta˝, u: Beker, Miroslav (1999), Suvremene književne teorije, Matica hrvatska, Zagreb.

Fish, Stanley (1989), ˝Being Interdisciplinary Is so Very Hard to Do˝, Pro- fession, 89, 15-22.

Frodeman, Robert (2017), ˝The Future of Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction˝, u: Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, Roberto Carlos Dos Santos Pacheco (ur.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford University Press.

Fuko, Mišel (Michel Foucault) (1998), Arheologija znanja, Plato, Beograd

Funtowicz, Silvio, Jerome Ravetz (2022), ˝Nauka u postnormalno doba˝, u: Postnormalna vremena (prir. Ziauddin Serdar), CNS, Sarajevo, 27-50.

Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983), ˝Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists˝, American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.

Graff, Harvey J. (2015), Undisciplining Knowledge. Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

Gunn, Gilles (1992), ˝Interdisciplinary Studies˝, u: Joseph Gibaldi (ed.), Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and literatures, New York, 239-261.

Jacobs, Jerry A. (2013), In Defense of Disciplines. Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago - London

Klein, Julie Thompson (2017), ˝Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition˝, u: Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 21-34.

Lyotard, Jean-François (2005), Postmoderno stanje: izvještaj o znanju, Ibis grafika, Zagreb

Moran, Joe (2002), Interdisciplinarity, Routledge, London - New York

Nussbaum, Martha (2009), Krhkost dobrote: sreća i etika u grčkoj tragediji i filozofiji, Službeni glasnik, Beograd

Radović, Srđan (2013), Grad kao tekst, XX vek, Beograd

Schudson, Michael (2006), ˝The Trouble with Experts – and Why Demo- cracies Need Them˝, Theory and Society, 35(5/6), 491-506.

Šeparović, Zvonimir, Božo Jušić (1982) ˝Mogućnosti, granice i dometi interdisciplinarnosti˝; u: Šeparović, Zvonimir, Božo Jušić (ur.), Interdis- ciplinarnost – znanost, obrazovanje, inovacija, Društvo psihologa Hrvatske - Pravni fakultet – Centar za stručno usavršavanje i suradnju s udruženim radom, 34–41.

Turudija, Simo (1982), ˝Interdisciplinarni model optimizacije samoupravnog organizacionog projektovanja˝, u: Šeparović, Zvonimir, Božo Jušić (ur.), Interdisciplinarnost – znanost, obrazovanje, inovacija, Društvo psihologa Hrvatske - Pravni fakultet - Centar za stručno usavršavanje i suradnju s udruženim radom, Zagreb, 34–41.

Van Leeuwen, Theo (2005), ˝Three models of interdisciplinarity˝, u: Ruth Wodak, Greg Myers (eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Philadelphia, 3-18.

Weingart, Peter (2000), ˝Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxical Discourse“, u: Weingart, Peter., Nico Stehr (ur.), Practising interdisciplinarity, University of Toronto Press. Toronto – Buffalo – London, 25-42.

Weiss, Gilbert, Ruth Wodak (2003), ˝Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis˝, u: Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, Pelgrave, New York




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2023.8.2.13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2490-3604 (print) ● ISSN: 2490-3647 (online)

Društvene i humanističke studije - DHS is under the Creative Commons licence.